In Gospel of John 5, the scene feels less like a sermon and more like a trial. A healed man stands as evidence, religious leaders bring charges, and Jesus Christ responds — not by defending Himself, but by calling witnesses.
First comes John the Baptist, the respected preacher they once admired. Then the miracles — public acts no one could deny. Then the Father’s approval seen in power and authority. Then the Scriptures themselves. Finally, the most shocking witness: Moses.
The twist?
The judges become the defendants.
Jesus’ argument is devastatingly simple:
If they truly believed the God they studied, they would recognize Him standing before them. Their problem was not lack of information but misdirected love. They searched sacred texts for certainty, status, and identity — but not for the Person those texts were about.
So the Bible becomes less like a textbook and more like a testimony. Every law, sacrifice, promise, and hope functions as a witness pointing beyond itself. Rejecting Jesus, He says, is not rejecting a new idea; it is rejecting the very story they claim to trust.
This raises a timeless question for modern readers.
We can analyze religion historically, debate it philosophically, or admire it ethically — yet still miss its center. The religious leaders knew Scripture better than anyone alive, yet stood opposite its fulfillment.
The real issue in John 5 is not evidence versus doubt.
It is pride versus surrender.
Faith, in this passage, is not merely agreeing with teachings about God — it is coming to a living person. The tragedy of the chapter is not that the evidence was weak, but that the hearts were closed.
The courtroom is still open.
The witnesses are still speaking.
The verdict depends on whether we read Scripture as information… or invitation.
Comments
Post a Comment